On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 03:00:35AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote: > Oleg Verych wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 02:26:04AM +0100, Richard Knutsson wrote: > >[] > > > >>I also guess you saw that the script is _not_ for cleaning up > >>source-files (can be intrusive and is better to be fixed when fixing > >>something else), but patches. > >> > > > >IMHO it's dealing with consequences, not cause, and it's even worse. > > > How many patches is not to fix bugs, it is worse then some strayed > whitespace but it is due to reality. > The best is, of course, if neither happened but the next best thing is
1. Patches are signed-off (not by you). 2. Maybe Andrew Morton under his sign-off add such feature. > >> (otherwise I believe they just deleted my mail ;) ). > >> > > > >I would like to discuss, would you? > > > I like to discuss but I am not sure what the result would be. Force > people to use the editors of our choice? > As long people uses valid e-mail-clients when sending patches (or they > use the script "sendpatchset"), I'm think we have to be satisfied. > But if you have any ideas, I'm listening. Open-source worker, hammering his fingers? Please, let me out it ;D > Richard Knutsson > _____ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/