4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>

commit 7c9b973061b03af62734f613f6abec46c0dd4a88 upstream.

The GICv3 driver wrongly assumes that it runs on the non-secure
side of a secure-enabled system, while it could be on a system
with a single security state, or a GICv3 with GICD_CTLR.DS set.

Either way, it is important to configure this properly, or
interrupts will simply not be delivered on this HW.

Reported-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c |   12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -387,6 +387,15 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(void)
        writel_relaxed(0, base + GICD_CTLR);
        gic_dist_wait_for_rwp();
 
+       /*
+        * Configure SPIs as non-secure Group-1. This will only matter
+        * if the GIC only has a single security state. This will not
+        * do the right thing if the kernel is running in secure mode,
+        * but that's not the intended use case anyway.
+        */
+       for (i = 32; i < gic_data.irq_nr; i += 32)
+               writel_relaxed(~0, base + GICD_IGROUPR + i / 8);
+
        gic_dist_config(base, gic_data.irq_nr, gic_dist_wait_for_rwp);
 
        /* Enable distributor with ARE, Group1 */
@@ -501,6 +510,9 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(void)
 
        rbase = gic_data_rdist_sgi_base();
 
+       /* Configure SGIs/PPIs as non-secure Group-1 */
+       writel_relaxed(~0, rbase + GICR_IGROUPR0);
+
        gic_cpu_config(rbase, gic_redist_wait_for_rwp);
 
        /* Give LPIs a spin */


Reply via email to