On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 18:17 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:00:55 -0000 > Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is a full replacement queue for the high resolution timer / dynamic > > ticks implemementation in -mm. > > The Vaio broke again. Seems to hang permanently the first time it tries to > sleep. The cursor doesn't flash. Adding "clock=pit" doesn't fix it. I'm > disinclined to bisect it since the patch series fails to compile at > practically all bisections points. > > I'll drop all the patches, which means I drop John's vsyscall patches and > his x86_64 conversion as well.
"He's got a bug!" What's his bug got to do with me? "He's got a bug!" I ain't trying to hear that, see? But seriously (the above might be too obscure of a reference :), my x86_64 GTOD patches were against vanilla and were not dependent on the HRT patches. There were a few merge/fixup patches in your tree, but I don't recall many of them being really interleaved w/ the HRT code. I'm I missing or forgetting some bit? Should I just revive the old 2.6.20-rc4-mm1 patches against your current tree and re-submit? Or should the HRT bits get settled first? "ain't no future in fronting" -john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/