On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Hector Martin "marcan" <mar...@marcan.st> wrote: > Then there is the other side: is there are reason not to just make the > plugin v2v3? That would certainly remove all doubt and potential issues, > and complies with both GCC's license and the kernel's.
If that works, please take it up with the plugin authors. You and I aren't going to convince each other, and I'm satisfied with the licensing as it already is. -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security
