[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > * User continues to happily listen to radio through sound card > You're using the sound card without a driver? Yes. The sound card allows itself to be unloaded when the pass-through mixer levels are non-zero. This is reasonable iff it can be reloaded without destroying those levels again. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > If you create a post-action in /etc/modules.conf which initializes > the mixer to proper levels, this problem does not exist. Yes it does. It can be a few seconds between initialisation and the post-action running. That's plenty of time to miss what the news announcer was saying about whether you need to go to work today (my gf is a teacher) or to wake the entire house if the mixer levels don't default to zero. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Dan Hollis
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Paul Jakma