On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 02:10:45PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 11:11:38AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:

> > Looks like I missed this one in v1, it should be
> >     
> >     return res;

Indeed.

> > because the primitives will return the values before modified by the
> > operations.
> > 
> 
> FWIW, I tested on ppc with ATOMIC64_SELFTEST=y for the following branch:

Thanks, I'll add a tested-by tag with your name on ;-)

Reply via email to