On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:12:31 +0530 Suparna Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:01:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 08:56:08 -0800 > > "Martin J. Bligh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > - It seems that people have been busy creating the need for this. I > > > > had to > > > > apply over sixty patches to this tree to fix post-2.6.20-rc4-mm1 > > > > compilation > > > > errors. And a number of patches were dropped due to no-compile or to > > > > runtime errors. Heaven knows how many runtime bugs were added. > > > > > > dbench seems to panic on xfs / cfq ? > > > > OK, I'll dump git-block.patch. That means that the fsaio patches get > > temporarily dropped as well as they depend on git-block changes somewhat. > > Would you like me to rework these back again to not depend on git-block ? Is OK thanks, I now have a git-block minus CFQ changes, so I have restored the fsaio patches. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
