On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:24:33AM -0500, Nilay Vaish wrote: > On 24 May 2016 at 14:52, Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote: > > From: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com> > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c > > index 715a1128daeb..dab184d86816 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-stat.c > > @@ -59,10 +59,13 @@ > > #include "util/thread.h" > > #include "util/thread_map.h" > > #include "util/counts.h" > > +#include "util/group.h" > > #include "util/session.h" > > #include "util/tool.h" > > +#include "util/group.h" > > #include "asm/bug.h" > > You have included util/group.h twice. Is this intentional?
No was a mistake thanks. > Continuing with my comment from above memory leak, if i == off, > topdown_attrs[0] will be NULL. So we would enter the else portion > here and return -1. But we never free the string we allocated in the > function topdown_filter_events(). I think we are leaking some memory > though seems only about 3 bytes. Right, however the process immediately exits afterwards, so it gets cleaned up anyways. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
