On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:30:56PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 01:06:17AM +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> > > Then there is the issue of architectures, at least in my book KS should
> > > focus on the ones that are really live and not in maintenance mode.
> > > x86_64, x86_32, PPC, ia64, ARM seems to be the driving ones these days,
> > > m68k, Sparc32, and others, somewhat less so .....
> >
> > Again, I don't recall us spending any time at all discussing m68k, or
> > sparc, whilst the others you mention were well represented.
>
> Well, others where represented, I was there looking after non-mmu m68k
> for example (and other general non-mmu stuff). There just wasn't much
> contentious stuff in that space that needed wider discussion.
Right, other than during the CPU architects panel, I don't remember
any non x86/ia64/ppc stuff being brought up at all.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
