Hi Kees,

After merging the pstore tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c:943:11: error: initialization from incompatible 
pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
  .read  = erst_reader,
           ^

Caused by commit

  d8aaf3511a13 ("pstore: add lzo/lz4 compression support")

I added this patch for today:

From: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:20:27 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] pstore: update acpi/apei/erst.c for struct pstore_info change

Fixes: d8aaf3511a13 ("pstore: add lzo/lz4 compression support")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c
index 006c3894c6ea..3024edf43a92 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/erst.c
@@ -927,7 +927,8 @@ static int erst_open_pstore(struct pstore_info *psi);
 static int erst_close_pstore(struct pstore_info *psi);
 static ssize_t erst_reader(u64 *id, enum pstore_type_id *type, int *count,
                           struct timespec *time, char **buf,
-                          bool *compressed, struct pstore_info *psi);
+                          bool *compressed, ssize_t *ecc_notice_size,
+                          struct pstore_info *psi);
 static int erst_writer(enum pstore_type_id type, enum kmsg_dump_reason reason,
                       u64 *id, unsigned int part, int count, bool compressed,
                       size_t size, struct pstore_info *psi);
@@ -987,7 +988,8 @@ static int erst_close_pstore(struct pstore_info *psi)
 
 static ssize_t erst_reader(u64 *id, enum pstore_type_id *type, int *count,
                           struct timespec *time, char **buf,
-                          bool *compressed, struct pstore_info *psi)
+                          bool *compressed, ssize_t *ecc_notice_size,
+                          struct pstore_info *psi)
 {
        int rc;
        ssize_t len = 0;
-- 
2.8.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Reply via email to