Now that all drivers providing ->target_index() callback are updated to
use 'index' only for indexing into policy->freq_table, we can safely
avoid keeping two separate freq-tables.

Which also means that cpufreq core doesn't use the freq_table passed to
cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(), once that routine has returned.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c    |  6 +-----
 drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 36 ++++++++++++++----------------------
 include/linux/cpufreq.h      |  9 ++-------
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 10c5f7abc205..47983cb0601d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_exit(struct cpufreq_policy 
*policy)
                return;
 
        cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
-       free_sorted_freq_table(policy);
+       kfree(policy->freq_table);
        policy->freq_table = NULL;
 }
 
@@ -1188,10 +1188,6 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
                goto out_free_policy;
        }
 
-       ret = create_sorted_freq_table(policy);
-       if (ret)
-               goto out_exit_policy;
-
        down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
        if (new_policy) {
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
index 15c4a2462c68..7afe2c017267 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
@@ -350,20 +350,11 @@ static int next_larger(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, 
unsigned int freq,
        return index;
 }
 
-void free_sorted_freq_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
-{
-       kfree(policy->sorted_freq_table);
-       policy->sorted_freq_table = NULL;
-}
-
-int create_sorted_freq_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+static int create_sorted_freq_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+                                   struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table)
 {
        struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos, *new_table;
        unsigned int freq, index, i, count = 0;
-       struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table = policy->freq_table;
-
-       if (!table)
-               return 0;
 
        cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, table)
                count++;
@@ -380,31 +371,32 @@ int create_sorted_freq_table(struct cpufreq_policy 
*policy)
                if (index == -EINVAL)
                        break;
 
-               /*
-                * driver_data of the sorted table points to the index of the
-                * unsorted table.
-                */
-               new_table[i].driver_data = index;
                new_table[i].frequency = table[index].frequency;
+               new_table[i].driver_data = table[index].driver_data;
+               new_table[i].flags = table[index].flags;
 
                freq = table[index].frequency;
        }
 
        new_table[i].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
-       policy->sorted_freq_table = new_table;
+       policy->freq_table = new_table;
 
        return 0;
 }
 
 int cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-                                     struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table)
+                                   struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table)
 {
-       int ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, table);
+       int ret;
+
+       if (!table)
+               return -EINVAL;
 
-       if (!ret)
-               policy->freq_table = table;
+       ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, table);
+       if (ret)
+               return ret;
 
-       return ret;
+       return create_sorted_freq_table(policy, table);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_table_validate_and_show);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 5aabec611e87..9df7c569cfbb 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
 
        struct cpufreq_user_policy user_policy;
        struct cpufreq_frequency_table  *freq_table;
-       struct cpufreq_frequency_table  *sorted_freq_table;
 
        struct list_head        policy_list;
        struct kobject          kobj;
@@ -593,8 +592,6 @@ static inline void dev_pm_opp_free_cpufreq_table(struct 
device *dev,
 
 int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                                    struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table);
-int create_sorted_freq_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
-void free_sorted_freq_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
 
 int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
                                   struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table);
@@ -616,10 +613,8 @@ static inline int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct 
cpufreq_policy *policy,
                                                 unsigned int target_freq,
                                                 unsigned int relation)
 {
-       int index = cpufreq_find_target_index(policy, policy->sorted_freq_table,
-                                             target_freq, relation);
-
-       return policy->sorted_freq_table[index].driver_data;
+       return cpufreq_find_target_index(policy, policy->freq_table,
+                                        target_freq, relation);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
-- 
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b

Reply via email to