On 2 June 2016 at 20:29, Javi Merino <[email protected]> wrote: > In 5a31d594a973 ("cpufreq: Allow freq_table to be obtained for offline > CPUs") you did the opposite: don't use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() because > it won't give you the policy of a cpu that is offline. Now you are > arguing that we should go back to cpufreq_cpu_get() which implicitly > calls cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(). Won't we hit the same issue that > 5a31d594a973 was trying to prevent: that we can't get a freq_table for > a cpu that is offline?
Yes, that should be fixed. Thanks for letting me know about it :)
