On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:28:09AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Use the same tactic to cpu and numa-distance nodes.

Sorry, I don't understand... :/

Will

> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leiz...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> index c7fe3ec..2601660 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> @@ -141,6 +141,11 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
>  {
>       int ret;
> 
> +     if (nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) {
> +             pr_warn("NUMA: Node id %u exceeds maximum value\n", nid);
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     }
> +
>       ret = memblock_set_node(start, (end - start), &memblock.memory, nid);
>       if (ret < 0) {
>               pr_err("NUMA: memblock [0x%llx - 0x%llx] failed to add on node 
> %d\n",
> --
> 2.5.0
> 
> 

Reply via email to