In some functions, returning a -ve decimal value is actually a valid return condition when the function is returning a value, however, it can also be misused for returning an error value that should ideally be a valid error code defined in include/uapi/asm-generic/errno-base.h or include/uapi/asm-generic/errno.h
Considering typical newbie error of doing the following: int fn(void) { /* ... error condition ... */ return -1; } void fn1(void) { /* some code */ if (fn() < 0) { pr_err("Error occurred\n"); return; } /* other cases... */ } Flag this as a check case for developer verification. Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> --- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index 4904ced676d4..f6fa07fe33a5 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -4351,6 +4351,12 @@ sub process { } } +# return with a value is not usually a good sign, unless the function is supposed to return a value + if (defined($stat) && $stat =~ /^.\s*return\s*-[0-9]+\s*;/s) { + CHK("RETURN_NUMBER", + "Suspect error return with a value, If this is error value, refer to include/uapi/asm-generic/errno-base.h and include/uapi/asm-generic/errno.h\n" . $herecurr); + } + # unnecessary return in a void function # at end-of-function, with the previous line a single leading tab, then return; # and the line before that not a goto label target like "out:" -- 2.8.0