--- Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 11:08:39AM -0800, Casey > Schaufler wrote: > > Alternativly you could move the SELinux specific > > bits out of /proc/self/attr into an equivalent > > /selinux/self/attr and avoid that /proc > dependency. > > Why?
To avoid the dependency and remove the issue. Just a thought. Weigh the advantages and disadvantages and do what seems right. > procfs is essential for any kind of fullblown > linux system, Kids! > and the selinux actually fits into the original > procfs intention, Yes, it does. It's a good use of /proc. > unlike all the other junk we've added over the > years. You won't get any arguements from me there. Casey Schaufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
