On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 12:32:13 +0100 Hugh Sipière <hgsipi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I changed it so that these two comments do not end on a line with text. > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Sipière <hgsipi...@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c b/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c > index 180e027..f2435f3 100644 > --- a/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c > +++ b/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c > @@ -231,7 +231,8 @@ static int ssb_gpio_chipco_init(struct ssb_bus *bus) > chip->ngpio = 16; > /* There is just one SoC in one device and its GPIO addresses should be > * deterministic to address them more easily. The other buses could get > - * a random base number. */ > + * a random base number. > + */ > if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB) > chip->base = 0; > else > @@ -424,7 +425,8 @@ static int ssb_gpio_extif_init(struct ssb_bus *bus) > chip->ngpio = 5; > /* There is just one SoC in one device and its GPIO addresses should be > * deterministic to address them more easily. The other buses could get > - * a random base number. */ > + * a random base number. > + */ > if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB) > chip->base = 0; > else What's the benefit from this change? Will the next person submit a patch to remove wasted lines that just contain a */? -- Michael
pgpwHFL4sJekp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
