Commit 5c9cbade0629 ("ARM: dts: exynos: Fix DTC unit name warnings in
Exynos5250") fixed all the DTC warnings about mismatchs between unit
names and reg properties in Exynos5250 boards DTS.
But unfortunately it also added a regression on the Exynos5250 Snow
Chromebook when changing the port node names since the OF graph logic
expects the port nodes to be always named 'port'.
The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt binding document says
that when there is more than one port, '#address-cells', '#size-cells'
and 'reg' properties should be used to number the port nodes.
Fixes: 5c9cbade0629 ("ARM: dts: exynos: Fix DTC unit name warnings in
Exynos5250")
Reported-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyng...@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi
index 419d59da1751..fadbea744e1a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow-common.dtsi
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@
hpd-gpios = <&gpx0 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
ports {
- port0 {
+ port {
dp_out: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&bridge_in>;
};
@@ -485,13 +485,20 @@
edid-emulation = <5>;
ports {
- port0 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ port@0 {
+ reg = <0>;
+
bridge_out: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
};
};
- port1 {
+ port@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+
bridge_in: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&dp_out>;
};
--
2.5.5
