On Tuesday 30 January 2007 16:31, Maynard Johnson wrote:
> 
> > On solution would be to move the notify_active flag from ctx->spu
> > into ctx itself, but maybe there are other ways to solve this.
> In an earlier review of this patch, Christopher Hellwig suggested I move 
> the notify_active flag to be a bit in the sched_flags field that's added 
> in his scheduler patch series.  If this patch series will be a available 
> in an "Arnd" tree that we'll be using for our current OProfile 
> development, perhaps I should wait until that time to change this, since 
> the window of vulnerability is quite small.  What do you think?

Sounds good to me.

        Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to