On 06/06, David Rientjes wrote: > > > There is a potential race where we kill the oom disabled task which is > > highly unlikely but possible. It would happen if __set_oom_adj raced > > with select_bad_process and then it is OK to consider the old value or > > with fork when it should be acceptable as well. > > Let's add a little note to the log so that people would tell us that > > this really happens in the real life and it matters. > > > > We cannot kill oom disabled processes at all, little race or otherwise.
But this change doesn't really make it worse? Oleg.
