On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 02:18:05PM +0530, Kedareswara rao Appana wrote:
> This patch updates the dmatest client to support
> scatter-gather dma mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kedareswara rao Appana <appa...@xilinx.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/dmatest.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
> index b8576fd..6f259d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,14 @@ module_param(iterations, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(iterations,
>               "Iterations before stopping test (default: infinite)");
>  
> +static unsigned int sg_sources = 1;
> +module_param(sg_sources, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(sg_sources,

sg_buffers rather?

> +             "Number of scatter gather buffers (default: 1)");

blank line please

> +static unsigned int dmatest = 1;
> +module_param(dmatest, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(dmatest,
> +             "dmatest 0-memcpy 1-slave_sg (default: 1)");

dmatest? What does this mean!

>  static unsigned int xor_sources = 3;
>  module_param(xor_sources, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(xor_sources,
> @@ -431,6 +439,8 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
>       dev = chan->device;
>       if (thread->type == DMA_MEMCPY)
>               src_cnt = dst_cnt = 1;
> +     else if (thread->type == DMA_SG)
> +             src_cnt = dst_cnt = sg_sources;
>       else if (thread->type == DMA_XOR) {
>               /* force odd to ensure dst = src */
>               src_cnt = min_odd(params->xor_sources | 1, dev->max_xor);
> @@ -485,6 +495,8 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
>               dma_addr_t *dsts;
>               unsigned int src_off, dst_off, len;
>               u8 align = 0;
> +             struct scatterlist tx_sg[src_cnt];
> +             struct scatterlist rx_sg[src_cnt];
>  
>               total_tests++;
>  
> @@ -577,10 +589,21 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
>                       um->bidi_cnt++;
>               }
>  
> +             sg_init_table(tx_sg, src_cnt);
> +             sg_init_table(rx_sg, dst_cnt);

why dst_cnt  here wheras you used src_cnt to create the list!

> +             for (i = 0; i < src_cnt; i++) {
> +                     sg_dma_address(&rx_sg[i]) = srcs[i];
> +                     sg_dma_address(&tx_sg[i]) = dsts[i] + dst_off;
> +                     sg_dma_len(&tx_sg[i]) = len;
> +                     sg_dma_len(&rx_sg[i]) = len;
> +             }
>               if (thread->type == DMA_MEMCPY)
>                       tx = dev->device_prep_dma_memcpy(chan,
>                                                        dsts[0] + dst_off,
>                                                        srcs[0], len, flags);
> +             else if (thread->type == DMA_SG)
> +                     tx = dev->device_prep_dma_sg(chan, tx_sg,
> +                                     dst_cnt, rx_sg, src_cnt, flags);

again dst_cnt

>               else if (thread->type == DMA_XOR)
>                       tx = dev->device_prep_dma_xor(chan,
>                                                     dsts[0] + dst_off,
> @@ -748,6 +771,8 @@ static int dmatest_add_threads(struct dmatest_info *info,
>  
>       if (type == DMA_MEMCPY)
>               op = "copy";
> +     else if (type == DMA_SG)
> +             op = "sg";
>       else if (type == DMA_XOR)
>               op = "xor";
>       else if (type == DMA_PQ)
> @@ -802,8 +827,16 @@ static int dmatest_add_channel(struct dmatest_info *info,
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dtc->threads);
>  
>       if (dma_has_cap(DMA_MEMCPY, dma_dev->cap_mask)) {
> -             cnt = dmatest_add_threads(info, dtc, DMA_MEMCPY);
> -             thread_count += cnt > 0 ? cnt : 0;
> +             if (dmatest == 0) {
> +                     cnt = dmatest_add_threads(info, dtc, DMA_MEMCPY);
> +                     thread_count += cnt > 0 ? cnt : 0;
> +             }
> +     }

blank line

-- 
~Vinod

Reply via email to