Hi Mark,

On 2016年06月07日 20:06, Mark Brown wrote:
OK, then the original name probably makes some sense though really
that's such an unusual design that just naming it after the specific
board might be better, it's not likely to see any reuse I'd guess.
There are not only one type of board with this audio connection, so I think we don't need to add specific board name.

Therefore, I intend to recover original name (rk3399_max98357a_rt5514_da7219.c), and description like this:
sound {
    compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-max98357a-rt5514-da7219";
rockchip,cpu = <&i2s0 &i2s0 &i2s0>; // note (will not be sent to upstream): In future, we may use the i2s1 or i2s2...
    rockchip,codec = <&max98357a &headsetcodec &codec>;
};

Could you please agree to do this?

Thanks.

--
- Xing Zheng


Reply via email to