On Mon, 06 Jun 2016, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
-static void expunge_all(struct msg_queue *msq, int res) +static void expunge_all(struct msg_queue *msq, int res, + struct wake_q_head *wake_q) { struct msg_receiver *msr, *t; list_for_each_entry_safe(msr, t, &msq->q_receivers, r_list) { - msr->r_msg = NULL; /* initialize expunge ordering */ - wake_up_process(msr->r_tsk); - /* - * Ensure that the wakeup is visible before setting r_msg as - * the receiving end depends on it: either spinning on a nil, - * or dealing with -EAGAIN cases. See lockless receive part 1 - * and 2 in do_msgrcv(). - */ + + WRITE_ONCE(msr->r_msg, ERR_PTR(res)); smp_wmb(); /* barrier (B) */ - msr->r_msg = ERR_PTR(res); + wake_q_add(wake_q, msr->r_tsk);
Given that wake_q_add() implies barriers on both sides (cmpxchg), I think we can rely on that instead of the explicit smp_wmb() for barrier B. While a failed call doesn't imply the barriers, we're already in a world of trouble _anyways_ if that's the case. Same for pipelined_send, obviously. Thanks, Davidlohr