submit_bio_wait() gives the caller an opportunity to examine
struct bio and so expects the caller to issue the put_bio()
This fixes a memory leak reported by a few people in 4.7-rc2
kmemleak report after 9082e87bfbf8 ("block: remove struct bio_batch")
Signed-off-by: Shaun Tancheff <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Larry [email protected]
Tested-by: David Drysdale <[email protected]>
---
block/blk-lib.c | 12 +++++++++---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
index 23d7f30..9e29dc3 100644
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev,
sector_t sector,
ret = submit_bio_wait(type, bio);
if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
ret = 0;
+ bio_put(bio);
}
blk_finish_plug(&plug);
@@ -165,8 +166,10 @@ int blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev,
sector_t sector,
}
}
- if (bio)
+ if (bio) {
ret = submit_bio_wait(REQ_WRITE | REQ_WRITE_SAME, bio);
+ bio_put(bio);
+ }
return ret != -EOPNOTSUPP ? ret : 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_write_same);
@@ -206,8 +209,11 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device
*bdev, sector_t sector,
}
}
- if (bio)
- return submit_bio_wait(WRITE, bio);
+ if (bio) {
+ ret = submit_bio_wait(WRITE, bio);
+ bio_put(bio);
+ return ret;
+ }
return 0;
}
--
2.8.1