On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 09:53:42PM +0000, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 14:41:36 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 
> > 4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > 
> > ------------------
> > 
> > From: Oliver Neukum <oneu...@suse.com>
> > 
> > commit 588afcc1c0e45358159090d95bf7b246fb67565f upstream.
> > 
> > This fixes the crash reported in:
> > http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2015/Oct/35
> > The interface number needs a sanity check.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneu...@suse.com>
> > Cc: Vladis Dronov <vdro...@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verk...@cisco.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@osg.samsung.com>
> > Cc: Moritz Muehlenhoff <mor...@wikimedia.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
> > 
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/usb/usbvision/usbvision-video.c |    7 +++++++
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > 
> > --- a/drivers/media/usb/usbvision/usbvision-video.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/usbvision/usbvision-video.c
> > @@ -1461,6 +1461,13 @@ static int usbvision_probe(struct usb_in
> >     printk(KERN_INFO "%s: %s found\n", __func__,
> >                             usbvision_device_data[model].model_string);
> >  
> > +   /*
> > +    * this is a security check.
> > +    * an exploit using an incorrect bInterfaceNumber is known
> > +    */
> > +   if (ifnum >= USB_MAXINTERFACES || !dev->actconfig->interface[ifnum])
> > +           return -ENODEV;
> > +
> >     if (usbvision_device_data[model].interface >= 0)
> >             interface = 
> > &dev->actconfig->interface[usbvision_device_data[model].interface]->altsetting[0];
> >     else if (ifnum < dev->actconfig->desc.bNumInterfaces)
> 
> Not sure if it matters, but heads up anyway that for some reason this
> patch is a duplicate and was previously applied quite some time ago:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/commit/?h=linux-4.4.y&id=588afcc1c0e45358159090d95bf7b246fb67565f

Yes, thanks, sorry for the confusion, Debian seems confused as well as
this is in their kernel tree too...

now dropped, thanks.

greg k-h

Reply via email to