On 08 June 2016 15:19, Mark Brown wrote: > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] MAINTAINERS: Add Dialog PMIC search terms for > missing documentation and header files > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:53:46AM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote: > > > The majority of these updates are for MFD documentation and headers, > > although there is a mixture with the regulators as well. > > > I previously send a patch TO: Lee and CC:'ed Mark, but I think now I > > need to resend V2 with Mark in the TO: field. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/11/419 > > No, the issue here is that this is MFD patch with a non-obvious subject > line,
Thanks Mark, I originally used "Dialog PMIC" in the Subject line to describe the coverage of MFD, regulator and input/ONKEY. I will be more explicit in future. > it's getting a lot of new versions (which usually indicates that > there's stuff going on and it might well change again quickly) and it's > getting replies (which would normally suggest it's being taken care of > or needs more revision). This all means that it looks like something > best left for later. > > > I have also updated this V2 patch to align with linux-next/v4.6 > > and removed the change to the onkey driver. > > > Lee: with Mark's Ack, would it be possible for you to take these > > through please? > > Acked-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]> > > We *really* shouldn't be blocking on my ack for trivial changes outside > the subsystem like this though :( There had been no reply since my first e-mail round about a month ago, so I figured there was something wrong with the patch submission. Lee has since applied PATCH V3 which I resent earlier today. That version finally removed the regulator files and deleted you from the TO: and CC: e-mail fields thereby removing you as a dependency. I will have to send the regulator updates separately at a later date. In future I will split up the responsibility and define the Subject line better to remove any ambiguity. Regards, Steve
