On Wed 08-06-16 22:04:50, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> CURRENT_TIME is not y2038 safe.
> 
> CURRENT_TIME macro is also not appropriate for filesystems
> as it doesn't use the right granularity for filesystem
> timestamps.
> 
> Logical Volume Integrity format is described to have the
> same timestamp format for "Recording Date and time" as
> the other [a,c,m]timestamps.
> Hence using current_fs_time() instead here promises to
> maintain the same granularity as other timestamps.
> 
> This is also in preparation for the patch that transitions
> vfs timestamps to use 64 bit time and hence make them
> y2038 safe. As part of the effort current_fs_time() will be
> extended to do range checks.

Just one nit below.

> @@ -2030,7 +2030,7 @@ static void udf_close_lvid(struct super_block *sb)
>       mutex_lock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
>       lvidiu->impIdent.identSuffix[0] = UDF_OS_CLASS_UNIX;
>       lvidiu->impIdent.identSuffix[1] = UDF_OS_ID_LINUX;
> -     udf_time_to_disk_stamp(&lvid->recordingDateAndTime, CURRENT_TIME);
> +     udf_time_to_disk_stamp(&lvid->recordingDateAndTime, 
> current_fs_time(sb));
>       if (UDF_MAX_WRITE_VERSION > le16_to_cpu(lvidiu->maxUDFWriteRev))
>               lvidiu->maxUDFWriteRev = cpu_to_le16(UDF_MAX_WRITE_VERSION);
>       if (sbi->s_udfrev > le16_to_cpu(lvidiu->minUDFReadRev))

Please wrap this line properly so that it does not exceed 80 characters.
Other than that feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>

                                                                Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <j...@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Reply via email to