Oliver Xymoron wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > The point here is that although I've put up with just keeping the sound
> > driver loaded for the last few years, permanently taking up a large amount
> > of DMA memory, the inter_module_xxx stuff that Keith is proposing would
> > give us a simple way of storing the data which we want to store.
> ...
> > Being able to do it completely in userspace would be neater, though.
>
> I think there are a bunch of other devices that need stuff from userspace
> before they fully init, namely the ones that load proprietary firmware
> images. Will an approach like that work here?
Some devices have a firmware.h that is compiled into the driver. A few
sound devices use a function that loads a firmware file from userspace,
given a filename. The comment in drivers/sound/sound_firmware.c says
that this is a poor method, and that the recommended method for
uploading firmware to a device is via ioctl.
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik | "When I do this, my computer freezes."
Building 1024 | -user
MandrakeSoft | "Don't do that."
| -level 1
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Evan Jeffrey
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... James A . Sutherland
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Martin Dalecki
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Paul Jakma
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Paul Jakma
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Keith Owens
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was Linux 2.4 Status /... Jeff Garzik

