On Jan 31 2007 08:34, David Hollis wrote: >Conversely, I've seen many cases of drivers that are developed by the >community, but kept out-of-kernel forever due to various reasons. Some >of them are due to the code quality and the developers not accepting the >feedback to get the drivers into shape to be 'kernel worthy', sometimes >it seems to be a lack of interest from the developers to merge upstream. >Maybe because they think they would lose control or something?
Putting the "codingstyle" control aside, often it's because things look too hackish. Take ipt_ROUTE as an example. It won't get included, since the "proper" way to do it would be using MARK and iproute2. But many users don't get that [no criticism here], because ipt_ROUTE is so much easier. (Probably because iproute2 and other netlink-using tools, like tc, lack thorough documentation.) Jan -- ft: http://freshmeat.net/p/chaostables/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/