Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com> writes:
> From: Shengzhen Li <s...@marvell.com>
>
> Most cfg80211 operations are just a wrappers to functions defined in the
> sta_ioctl.c file, so for consistency move the .get_tx_power logic there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shengzhen Li <s...@marvell.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akar...@marvell.com>
> [javier: update the subject line and commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <jav...@osg.samsung.com>
[...]
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
> @@ -385,18 +385,10 @@ mwifiex_cfg80211_get_tx_power(struct wiphy *wiphy,
> int *dbm)
> {
> struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter = mwifiex_cfg80211_get_adapter(wiphy);
> - struct mwifiex_private *priv = mwifiex_get_priv(adapter,
> - MWIFIEX_BSS_ROLE_ANY);
> - int ret = mwifiex_send_cmd(priv, HostCmd_CMD_RF_TX_PWR,
> - HostCmd_ACT_GEN_GET, 0, NULL, true);
> -
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> -
> - /* tx_power_level is set in HostCmd_CMD_RF_TX_PWR command handler */
> - *dbm = priv->tx_power_level;
> + struct mwifiex_private *priv;
>
> - return 0;
> + priv = mwifiex_get_priv(adapter, MWIFIEX_BSS_ROLE_ANY);
> + return mwifiex_get_tx_power(priv, dbm);
> }
So in patch 1 you added the patch and in patch 2 you move it to a
different location? That doesn't make any sense, can't you just fold the
two patches into one so that the function is added only once.
--
Kalle Valo
