3.16.36-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dominik Dingel <din...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit 7f9be77555bb2e52de84e9dddf7b4eb20cc6e171 upstream.
On s390 we only can enable hugepages if the underlying hardware/hypervisor
also does support this. Common code now would assume this to be
signaled by setting HPAGE_SHIFT to 0. But on s390, where we only
support one hugepage size, there is a link between HPAGE_SHIFT and
pageblock_order.
So instead of setting HPAGE_SHIFT to 0, we will implement the check for
the hardware capability.
Signed-off-by: Dominik Dingel <din...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidef...@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Holzheu <holz...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schae...@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
arch/s390/include/asm/hugetlb.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/hugetlb.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/hugetlb.h
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#define is_hugepage_only_range(mm, addr, len) 0
#define hugetlb_free_pgd_range free_pgd_range
+#define hugepages_supported() (MACHINE_HAS_HPAGE)
void set_huge_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
pte_t *ptep, pte_t pte);
