On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 09:48:30PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > > > > > Is there another scripts/coccinelle/ file I can use to test against to > > > > demo > > > > against glimpse/idutils/gitgrep best? > > > > > > I'd think this one may be a candidate: > > > > > > scripts/coccinelle/misc/irqf_oneshot.cocci > > > > > > Not too many, but quite some matches over the tree. > > > > Seems like a reasonable choice. > > With this one on a 32-core system, I get: > > glimpse: > real 0m6.549s > user 0m49.136s > sys 0m3.076s > > idutils: > real 0m6.749s > user 0m51.936s > sys 0m3.876s > > gitgrep: > real 0m6.805s > user 0m51.572s > sys 0m4.432s > > coccigrep: > real 0m16.369s > user 0m58.712s > sys 0m5.064s > > I redirected stderr to stdout, and verified glimpse output has: > > glimpse request = request_threaded_irq > > Does this match expectations? Yes. I'm not sure that gitgrep would work as well when there are multiple keywords. It may descend to coccigrep. julia
