* Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > +static const struct devs_id pcal9555a_1_dev_id __initconst = { > + .name = "pcal9555a-1", > + .type = SFI_DEV_TYPE_I2C, > + .delay = 1, > + .get_platform_data = &pcal9555a_platform_data, > +}; > + > +static const struct devs_id pcal9555a_2_dev_id __initconst = { > + .name = "pcal9555a-2", > + .type = SFI_DEV_TYPE_I2C, > + .delay = 1, > + .get_platform_data = &pcal9555a_platform_data, > +}; > + > +static const struct devs_id pcal9555a_3_dev_id __initconst = { > + .name = "pcal9555a-3", > + .type = SFI_DEV_TYPE_I2C, > + .delay = 1, > + .get_platform_data = &pcal9555a_platform_data, > +}; > + > +static const struct devs_id pcal9555a_4_dev_id __initconst = { > + .name = "pcal9555a-4", > + .type = SFI_DEV_TYPE_I2C, > + .delay = 1, > + .get_platform_data = &pcal9555a_platform_data, > +};
I have the same complaint as yesterday. Going forward could we please get nice structure initializers in all future patches? :) Thanks, Ingo