* Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> +static const struct devs_id pcal9555a_1_dev_id __initconst = {
> +     .name = "pcal9555a-1",
> +     .type = SFI_DEV_TYPE_I2C,
> +     .delay = 1,
> +     .get_platform_data = &pcal9555a_platform_data,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct devs_id pcal9555a_2_dev_id __initconst = {
> +     .name = "pcal9555a-2",
> +     .type = SFI_DEV_TYPE_I2C,
> +     .delay = 1,
> +     .get_platform_data = &pcal9555a_platform_data,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct devs_id pcal9555a_3_dev_id __initconst = {
> +     .name = "pcal9555a-3",
> +     .type = SFI_DEV_TYPE_I2C,
> +     .delay = 1,
> +     .get_platform_data = &pcal9555a_platform_data,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct devs_id pcal9555a_4_dev_id __initconst = {
> +     .name = "pcal9555a-4",
> +     .type = SFI_DEV_TYPE_I2C,
> +     .delay = 1,
> +     .get_platform_data = &pcal9555a_platform_data,
> +};

I have the same complaint as yesterday. Going forward could we please get nice 
structure initializers in all future patches? :)

Thanks,

        Ingo

Reply via email to