On Jun 03 2016 or thereabouts, Andrew Duggan wrote:
> Remove the data_base_addr_offset variable in rmi_f11_attention(). The
> f11 data is read as a single block so there is no need to store an offset
> to the data address.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Duggan <adug...@synaptics.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com>
Cheers,
Benjamin
> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c
> index e691432..688e604 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_f11.c
> @@ -1265,7 +1265,6 @@ static int rmi_f11_attention(struct rmi_function *fn,
> unsigned long *irq_bits)
> struct rmi_driver_data *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&rmi_dev->dev);
> struct f11_data *f11 = dev_get_drvdata(&fn->dev);
> u16 data_base_addr = fn->fd.data_base_addr;
> - u16 data_base_addr_offset = 0;
> int error;
>
> if (rmi_dev->xport->attn_data) {
> @@ -1275,8 +1274,7 @@ static int rmi_f11_attention(struct rmi_function *fn,
> unsigned long *irq_bits)
> rmi_dev->xport->attn_size -= f11->sensor.attn_size;
> } else {
> error = rmi_read_block(rmi_dev,
> - data_base_addr + data_base_addr_offset,
> - f11->sensor.data_pkt,
> + data_base_addr, f11->sensor.data_pkt,
> f11->sensor.pkt_size);
> if (error < 0)
> return error;
> @@ -1284,7 +1282,6 @@ static int rmi_f11_attention(struct rmi_function *fn,
> unsigned long *irq_bits)
>
> rmi_f11_finger_handler(f11, &f11->sensor, irq_bits,
> drvdata->num_of_irq_regs);
> - data_base_addr_offset += f11->sensor.pkt_size;
>
> return 0;
> }
> --
> 2.5.0
>
