On 06/16/2016 12:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 13/06/2016 16:44, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 10 +++++----- >>>> arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig | 1 - >>>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 +++-------- >>>> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++------ >>>> virt/kvm/Kconfig | 3 --- >>>> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- >>>> 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) >>>> >> Looks like a sane approach, only two inversions in the s390 patch :) > > So it's okay to push patch 3 to kvm/next?
With the 2 fixes that Conny requested, yes. With that fixed up, Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
