On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 05:04:24PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> writes: > > > If not, do you want me to 'fix' this or just remove the comment? > > It's not broken, so nothing to fix.
Its non obvious code, that's usually plenty reason to change it. Geert, you maintain this stuff, what say you? Is there still a good reason (like supporting ancient compilers that don't do "+d" for example) to keep the code as is?
