On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:07:47PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote: > > Agree with you. If the some chips are not stable, we can add a check > > to ignore them with family and model id. > > So if family 0x16 is not "stable" as you say, we probably should keep > the cpu_match array too.
Has anyone actually verified that the fam15h excavator machines are producing "stable" results? I know on my fam15h piledriver machines the results returned by the drivers/hwmon/fam15h_power.c driver look questionable at best, which is what started my trying to figure this whole thing out in the first place. Vince
