On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 01:00:42PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> @@ -213,24 +232,46 @@ struct kmem_cache *vm_area_cachep;
> /* SLAB cache for mm_struct structures (tsk->mm) */
> static struct kmem_cache *mm_cachep;
>
> -static void account_kernel_stack(struct thread_info *ti, int account)
> +static void account_kernel_stack(struct task_struct *tsk, int account)
> {
> - struct zone *zone = page_zone(virt_to_page(ti));
> + struct zone *zone;
> + struct thread_info *ti = task_thread_info(tsk);
> + struct vm_struct *vm = task_stack_vm_area(tsk);
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VMAP_STACK) && PAGE_SIZE % 1024 != 0);
> +
> + if (vm) {
> + int i;
>
> - mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB,
> - THREAD_SIZE / 1024 * account);
> + BUG_ON(vm->nr_pages != THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE);
>
> - /* All stack pages belong to the same memcg. */
> - memcg_kmem_update_page_stat(
> - virt_to_page(ti), MEMCG_KERNEL_STACK,
> - account * (THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE));
> + for (i = 0; i < THREAD_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE; i++) {
> + mod_zone_page_state(page_zone(vm->pages[i]),
> + 1, PAGE_SIZE / 1024 * account);
Shouldn't the second argument be NR_KERNEL_STACK_KB instead of 1?
--
Josh
