Hi.
I have not had any comment on this patch,
but it looks correct to me.
I will put it into Russell's patch tracker
if nobody is against it.
2016-06-13 21:25 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>:
> Since commit 2b749cb3a515 ("ARM: realview: remove private barrier
> implementation"), this config is not used by any platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
> ---
>
> arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h | 4 +---
> arch/arm/mm/Kconfig | 6 ------
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h
> index 112cc1a..f5d6981 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h
> @@ -44,9 +44,7 @@ extern void arm_heavy_mb(void);
> #define __arm_heavy_mb(x...) dsb(x)
> #endif
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_BARRIERS
> -#include <mach/barriers.h>
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE) || defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE) || defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> #define mb() __arm_heavy_mb()
> #define rmb() dsb()
> #define wmb() __arm_heavy_mb(st)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> index cb569b6..d15a7fe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -1025,12 +1025,6 @@ config ARM_DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE
>
> You are recommended say 'Y' here and debug any affected drivers.
>
> -config ARCH_HAS_BARRIERS
> - bool
> - help
> - This option allows the use of custom mandatory barriers
> - included via the mach/barriers.h file.
> -
> config ARM_HEAVY_MB
> bool
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
