On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:36:19AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Hello, > > just for information
Thank you for informing it. > > there was a proposal from -rt people to use normal spinlocks > for table's entries, rather that bitspinlock. I had a patch > some time ago, will obtain some performance data and post > RFC [may be tomorrow]. > > -ss >
