On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 07:14:07PM +0000, Oleg Verych wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:03:32PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > On Thursday 25 January 2007 4:40 am, Oleg Verych wrote: > > > > Your objection is a bit like saying "and don't use cat". I'm saying > > > > don't > > > > call cat "gcat" when you just mean plain old cat. > > > > > > No it's not, really. I don't want to see pipes, fork()s, disk seek, > > > when task can be done without it. I know, what awk is, and i hope it > > > will have its better time. > > > > *shrug* Making the need for "gawk" go away was my goal, and gawk->awk was > > the > > minimal change. If you want more than that, I'm not objecting, just not > > personally interested. > > Yes making uclibc as a bit more work, than rename things ;D. And my > change is mainly from optimization point of view (say modern embedded ;) > > > I believe "shift 5" is also SUSv3. :) > > If you have tested, please send ack or nack to us.
Yes, shift [n] is available in SuSv3: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/shift.html Regards: David -- /) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Northern lights wander (\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Full colour fire (/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/