On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:32:08PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > I strongly nak that. If you combine two object files (e.g. foo.o, bar.o) > that have different licenses, the resulting object file (comb.o) IMHO > constitutes a combined work, and hence the GPL should be applied to all of > it. That obviously "does not work" - what good is a GPL comb.o file if you > don't have the source to bar.o?
Gaaah. This is why it's a bad idea to try to attempt to do GPL "enforcement" in kernel code. Your reasoning is totally bogus. GPL is only about distribution, and if a user is building a standalone module which they never distibute, the provisions of GPL won't apply, since it's only about distribution, and a user who builds an ATI or Nvidia module in the privacy of their own home won't be violating the GPL. - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/