On Wed, 22 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:18:41PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2016, Nicolas Palix (LIG) wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Le 21/06/16 à 21:21, Luis R. Rodriguez a écrit : > > > > Sprinkling *tons* of documentation on the script is not a good > > > > idea, instead refer to a wiki for further coccicheck documentation: > > > > > > > > https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck > > > > > > > > This page shall always refer to the linux-next iteration of > > > > scripts/coccicheck. > > > > > > Can you say a word about Documentation/coccinelle.txt too ? > > > And update it according to the script changes. > > > > I think this would be a good idea. > > I'd much prefer to just keep docs in a wiki, and we nuke this outdated doc or > refer in the Documentation/coccinelle.txt to the wiki. This lets us document > things much faster and lets us add more information in a much nicer format. > But > that's just me... External links have a surprising way of disappearing. They also require internet access. julia > The existing file Documentation/coccinelle.txt even provides documentation on > how to build coccinelle --we're way passed that point. Note, I havne't > updated the docs on the wiki to refer to any of this, and would not unless > these changes get merged at least to linux-next. > > Luis >
