On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:52:45AM +0200, Jirka Hladky wrote: > Hi Peter, > > the performance regression has been caused by this commit > > ================================================= > commit 6ecdd74962f246dfe8750b7bea481a1c0816315d > Author: Yuyang Du <yuyang...@intel.com> > Date: Tue Apr 5 12:12:26 2016 +0800 > > sched/fair: Generalize the load/util averages resolution definition > ================================================= > > Could you please have a look?
That patch looks like a NO-OP to me. In any case, the good news it that I can run the benchmark, the bad news is that the patch you fingered doesn't appear to be it. v4.60: ./4.6.0/2016-Jun-22_11h11m07s.log:Score on xml.transform: 2007.18 ops/m ./4.6.0/2016-Jun-22_11h11m07s.log:Score on xml.validation: 2999.44 ops/m tip/master: ./4.7.0-rc4-00345-gf6e78bb/2016-Jun-22_11h30m27s.log:Score on xml.transform: 1283.14 ops/m ./4.7.0-rc4-00345-gf6e78bb/2016-Jun-22_11h30m27s.log:Score on xml.validation: 2008.62 ops/m patch^1 ./4.6.0-rc5-00034-g2159197/2016-Jun-22_12h38m50s.log:Score on xml.transform: 1196.18 ops/m ./4.6.0-rc5-00034-g2159197/2016-Jun-22_12h38m50s.log:Score on xml.validation: 2055.11 ops/m patch^1 + patch ./4.6.0-rc5-00034-g2159197-dirty/2016-Jun-22_12h55m43s.log:Score on xml.transform: 1294.59 ops/m ./4.6.0-rc5-00034-g2159197-dirty/2016-Jun-22_12h55m43s.log:Score on xml.validation: 2140.02 ops/m
