On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Zhaoyang Huang wrote: > On 23 June 2016 at 15:01, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > Thomas, I agree with you, I have discussed the modification with the > call back owner. However, I wonder if we can make the idle's framework > to be more precised without the assumption of short CPU_PM_ENTER > callbacks. Thank you!
What's the point? To help people who put insanities into the idle code path?
Thanks,
tglx
