On June 23, 2016 10:30:34 AM EDT, Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 05:43:40PM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote: >> From: Rohit Thapliyal <[email protected]> >> >> swiotlb default size of 64M is too big as >> default value therefore it is made configurable >> through command line through swiotlb_size parameter. >> swiotlb allocation shall be done only when the >> swiotlb size is given through command line. >> Otherwise no swiotlb is allocated. > >I already queued this patch: > >http://lkml.kernel.org/g/[email protected] > >If you have any objections to it, please reply there.
I do (sorry about duplicate email, the other got rejected by mailing lists). Why not expand the swiotlb= parameter instead of introducing a new one? Also, why not use the swiotlb by itself? That does the job as well?
