On 6/23/2016 8:45 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Commit 920de6ebfab8 apparently exposed a latent bug, doorbell.access_width
is initialized to 64, but per Lv Zheng, it should be 4, and indeed, making
that change does bring pcc-cpufreq back to life.

Suggested-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zh...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikb...@gmail.com>
---
  drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c |    2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int __init pcc_cpufreq_probe(void
        doorbell.space_id = reg_resource->space_id;
        doorbell.bit_width = reg_resource->bit_width;
        doorbell.bit_offset = reg_resource->bit_offset;
-       doorbell.access_width = 64;
+       doorbell.access_width = 4;
        doorbell.address = reg_resource->address;
pr_debug("probe: doorbell: space_id is %d, bit_width is %d, "


OK, I picked this up from the LKML patchwork (will push to Linus tomorrow), but next time please CC patches related to ACPI to linux-acpi and PM patches to linux-pm (so this one should have gone to both, ideally). They are much easier to handle/review then and more people are likely to look at them too.


Thanks,

Rafael


Reply via email to