On Monday, June 27, 2016 9:56:13 AM CEST Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Yury Norov <yno...@caviumnetworks.com> writes:
>
> > diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/bits/fcntl.h
> > b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/bits/fcntl.h
> > index 658f696..7dcbe65 100644
> > --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/bits/fcntl.h
> > +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/aarch64/bits/fcntl.h
> > @@ -25,7 +25,11 @@
> > #define __O_NOFOLLOW 0100000
> > #define __O_DIRECT 0200000
> >
> > -#define __O_LARGEFILE 0
> > +#ifdef __ILP32__
> > +# define __O_LARGEFILE 0400000
> > +#else
> > +# define __O_LARGEFILE 0
> > +#endif
>
> Is there any point in defining O_LARGEFILE to non-zero if the kernel is
> enforcing it anyway?
The kernel might want to return -EINVAL for undefined flags. I'm not
sure if we want to do that here, but it would seem like a correct
return code.
Arnd
