The new simplified __pvclock_read_cycles does the same computation
as vread_pvclock, except that (because it takes the pvclock_vcpu_time_info
pointer) it has to be moved inside the loop. Since the loop is expected to
never roll, this makes no difference.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c | 16 +++-------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
index db1e3b4c3693..94d54d0defa7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/vdso/vclock_gettime.c
@@ -96,9 +96,8 @@ static notrace cycle_t vread_pvclock(int *mode)
{
const struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *pvti = &get_pvti0()->pvti;
cycle_t ret;
- u64 tsc, pvti_tsc;
- u64 last, delta, pvti_system_time;
- u32 version, pvti_tsc_to_system_mul, pvti_tsc_shift;
+ u64 last;
+ u32 version;
/*
* Note: The kernel and hypervisor must guarantee that cpu ID
@@ -130,18 +129,9 @@ static notrace cycle_t vread_pvclock(int *mode)
return 0;
}
- tsc = rdtsc_ordered();
- pvti_tsc_to_system_mul = pvti->tsc_to_system_mul;
- pvti_tsc_shift = pvti->tsc_shift;
- pvti_system_time = pvti->system_time;
- pvti_tsc = pvti->tsc_timestamp;
+ ret = __pvclock_read_cycles(pvti);
} while (pvclock_read_retry(pvti, version));
- delta = tsc - pvti_tsc;
- ret = pvti_system_time +
- pvclock_scale_delta(delta, pvti_tsc_to_system_mul,
- pvti_tsc_shift);
-
/* refer to vread_tsc() comment for rationale */
last = gtod->cycle_last;
--
1.8.3.1
