On 6/27/2016 5:05 PM, ok...@codeaurora.org wrote:
> On 2016-06-27 16:04, Wim Osterholt wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 04:22:18AM -0400, ok...@codeaurora.org wrote:
>>> > However, an earlier try on my Inspiron 510m did not work.
>>> > I'll do a clean retry later today, just to make sure.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, let me know. I can post a clean patch series. I was trying to get
>>> you something to test before posting the official version.
>>
>> The 510m just finished compiling and now it works fine too.
>> Thanks.
>>
> 
> Nice, I will post the official version and let you know.
> 

I posted this [PATCH V2 0/4] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct ISA penalty calculation

Can you test this and give me a tested-by?

Alex,
If you could also review this, it would be great.

Sinan

>>
>>
>> Regards, Wim.
>>
>>
>> ----- w...@djo.tudelft.nl -----
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux 
Foundation Collaborative Project

Reply via email to