On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 08:43:48 +0200
Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:

> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > index 94aa10ffe156..62693900cc4b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kernel.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
> > @@ -631,7 +631,24 @@ do {                                                   
> >                 \
> >                                                                     \
> >     __trace_printk_check_format(fmt, ##args);                       \
> >                                                                     \
> > -   if (__builtin_constant_p(fmt))                                  \
> > +   if (__builtin_constant_p(fmt) &&                                \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pF") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pf") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pR") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pr") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pb") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pM") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pI") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pE") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pU") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pV") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pN") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pa") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pd") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pC") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pD") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pg") &&                            \
> > +       !__builtin_strstr(fmt, "%pG"))                              \
> >             __trace_bprintk(_THIS_IP_, trace_printk_fmt, ##args);   \
> >     else                                                            \
> >             __trace_printk(_THIS_IP_, fmt, ##args);                 \  
> 
> is this one working? it seems better to me than adding new trace_printk_ptr

The problem with this is that it would require a bunch more conditions
as you see it would not have helped your own use case (requiring the *p)

I'm actually looking into extending your patch to handle all cases that
vbin_printf() is an issue.

Thinking about it more, as vbin_printf() is a two part process, it
should by default not depend on any dereferencing, as I can't think of
any use case for it where it wouldn't be an issue.

-- Steve

Reply via email to